editor@ajptr.com
9409046853
e-ISSN: 2249-3387
logo

American Journal of PharmTech Research

American Journal of PharmTech Research

AJPTR – Open Access Pharmacy Journal | Pharmaceutical Sciences Research

American Journal of PharmTech Research (AJPTR) – peer-reviewed, open access pharmacy journal with fast publication and global indexing.  Publish your research paper in a peer reviewed pharmacy journal. 

📢 Latest Update: Call for Papers 2026: Now accepting submissions for June 2026 issue — Submit by June 10"

📢 Latest Update: Call for Papers 2026: Now accepting submissions for June 2026 issue — Submit by June 10"

Important Journal Details

Title:
American Journal of PharmTech Research
Journal Short Name:
AJPTR
e-ISSN (Online):
2249-3387
Year of Establishment:
2011
Frequency of the Publication:
Bi-Monthly (1 Issue / 2 months)
Publication Format:
Online
Publication URL:
https://ajptr.com
Related Subject:
Drug DevelopmentFormulationPharmaceutical NanotechnologyB...+ View more
Language:
English
Editor-in-Chief:
Dr H J Patel
Editorial Board:
Click Here →
Journal's Email ID:
editor@ajptr.com

Download Forms & Formats

Download Hub

Journal Features

Rigorous Peer Review

All submissions undergo thorough evaluation by experts in the field to ensure quality and validity.

Global Reach

Published papers reach an international audience of researchers, academics, and industry professionals.

Rapid Publication

Efficient review process ensures timely publication of accepted papers without compromising quality.

Open Access

All published papers are freely accessible online, maximizing visibility and impact of your research.

Publication Process

1

Prepare Manuscript

Format your paper according to our guidelines

View Guidelines
style="fill: var(--journal-600);"
2

Submit Paper

Upload your manuscript through our system

Submit Now
3

Peer Review

Your paper undergoes expert evaluation

Learn More
4

Publication

Accepted papers are published worldwide

View Publications
View All Issues
Cover image for Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interactions Between

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interactions Between

Nagaraju B, Anilkumar KV, Samhitha J, Padmavathi GV, Neerajraj GN

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) frequently coexists with hypertension, substantially increasing the risk of cardiovascular morbidity, mortality, and progressive renal disease. Contemporary management of these comorbid conditions relies heavily on polypharmacy, with oral antidiabetic drugs and antihypertensive agents prescribed concomitantly for prolonged durations. Among antidiabetic therapies, the fixed-dose combination of glimepiride and metformin remains widely used because it addresses both insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are commonly recommended antihypertensive agents in patients with T2DM due to their established renoprotective and cardioprotective benefits. However, accumulating experimental and clinical evidence suggests that ARBs are not metabolically inert; instead, they may influence glucose homeostasis, insulin sensitivity, and the pharmacokinetic disposition of antidiabetic drugs. These effects raise clinically relevant concerns regarding potential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions when ARBs are co-administered with glimepiride-metformin combinations. Preclinical investigations have demonstrated enhanced hypoglycemic responses when certain ARBs, such as losartan and telmisartan, are combined with glimepiride-metformin, possibly due to synergistic pharmacodynamic actions or alterations in drug metabolism and transport. Telmisartan, in particular, exhibits partial peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) agonist activity, which may confer additional insulin-sensitizing effects. Clinical evidence, however, remains limited and inconsistent, with some studies suggesting modest improvements in glycemic control and others indicating an increased risk of hypoglycemia, especially in regimens containing sulfonylureas. Moreover, most available studies lack integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic assessments and fail to reflect chronic real-world combination therapy. This review critically synthesizes current preclinical and clinical evidence on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between glimepiride-metformin combinations and ARBs. It highlights existing knowledge gaps, underscores the clinical necessity for systematic and ARB specific evaluation, and proposes future research directions aimed at optimizing safety and therapeutic outcomes in patients with coexisting T2DM and hypertension.

Cover image for Carvedilol Microspheres: A Review of Formulation Strategies, Polymer Applications, and Drug Release Engineering

Carvedilol Microspheres: A Review of Formulation Strategies, Polymer Applications, and Drug Release Engineering

Anupama Chaturvedi, Deepak Marothia

Among the drugs used in long-term cardiovascular management, carvedilol occupies a special position owing to its combined non-selective beta-blockade and alpha-1 receptor antagonism. However, turning this pharmacological advantage into consistent clinical benefit is not straightforward. The molecule belongs to BCS Class II, meaning it crosses biological membranes readily but barely dissolves in physiological fluids. On top of that, extensive hepatic extraction during the first pass through the liver trims oral bioavailability to somewhere between 25 and 35 percent, and an elimination half-life of only 6 to 10 hours forces patients to take the drug multiple times a day. Together, these characteristics create the conditions for erratic plasma concentrations, missed doses, and avoidable side effects. Encapsulating carvedilol within polymer-matrix microspheres is a strategy with growing experimental support: the polymer network acts as a physical throttle on drug escape, stretching the release window well beyond what any immediate-release tablet can offer. This article brings together evidence published between 2016 and 2025 on how microsphere formulations of carvedilol are built, what polymers are chosen and why, how the finished particles are tested, and what the most informative recent studies have found. Across this body of work, entrapment efficiencies consistently exceed 75 percent when formulation conditions are properly optimised, and release profiles extending to 12 hours or beyond are regularly achieved. Floating, pH-sensitive, and mucoadhesive variants each address specific absorption or tolerability concerns, broadening the design toolbox available to formulators.

Publication Process

Learn about our 4-step publication process

Submission Guidelines

Review requirements before submitting

Submit Article

Ready to submit your research?

2,878
Published Articles
1,523
Active Researchers
45
Countries
4.2
Impact Factor
Whatsapp