e-ISSN: 2249-3387
logo

American Journal of PharmTech Research

American Journal of PharmTech Research

Advancing knowledge through rigorous peer-reviewed research across multiple disciplines. Join the global community of scholars shaping the future of academic discovery.

📢 Latest Update: Call for Papers: Special Issue on PharmTech Research – Submit to American Pharmacy Journal (AJPTR) by March 31, 2026

📢 Latest Update: Call for Papers: Special Issue on PharmTech Research – Submit to American Pharmacy Journal (AJPTR) by March 31, 2026

Important Journal Details

Title:
American Journal of PharmTech Research
Journal Short Name:
AJPTR
e-ISSN (Online):
2249-3387
Year of Establishment:
2011
Frequency of the Publication:
Bi-Monthly (2 Issues / month)
Publication Format:
Online
Publication URL:
https://ajptr.com
Related Subject:
Drug DevelopmentFormulationPharmaceutical NanotechnologyB...+ View more
Language:
English
Editor-in-Chief:
Dr Hemangi J Patel
Editorial Board:
Click Here →
Journal's Email ID:
editor@ajptr.com

Download Forms & Formats

Download Hub

Journal Features

Rigorous Peer Review

All submissions undergo thorough evaluation by experts in the field to ensure quality and validity.

Global Reach

Published papers reach an international audience of researchers, academics, and industry professionals.

Rapid Publication

Efficient review process ensures timely publication of accepted papers without compromising quality.

Open Access

All published papers are freely accessible online, maximizing visibility and impact of your research.

Publication Process

1

Prepare Manuscript

Format your paper according to our guidelines

View Guidelines
style="fill: var(--journal-600);"
2

Submit Paper

Upload your manuscript through our system

Submit Now
3

Peer Review

Your paper undergoes expert evaluation

Learn More
4

Publication

Accepted papers are published worldwide

View Publications
View All Issues
Cover image for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Mechanisms of Pathogenesis and Insights into Herbal versus Synthetic Treatments

Peptic Ulcer Disease: Mechanisms of Pathogenesis and Insights into Herbal versus Synthetic Treatments

Neha Chauhan2*, Ashutosh Upadhayay4, Farmaan armaan, Rajkiran ajkiran

Peptic ulcer disease remains a pressing health issue worldwide, most often linked to Helicobacter pylori infection and long-term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). While conventional therapies such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), cytoprotective agents, and antibiotics have transformed patient care by reducing acid secretion and eradicating infection, they are not without drawbacks. Rising antibiotic resistance, drug-related side effects, and recurrence of ulcers continue to challenge clinicians and patients alike. In recent years, herbal medicine has gained attention as a complementary or alternative approach. Plant-derived compounds rich in flavonoids, tannins, alkaloids, and terpenoids offer anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antisecretory effects, while also strengthening the stomach’s natural defenses. Traditional remedies such as Anogeissus latifolia, Alchornea castaneaefolia, Decalepis salicifolia, Solanum nigrum, Ocimum tenuiflorum, Asparagus racemosus, and Curcuma longa have shown promising results in experimental models, not only reducing ulcer formation but also accelerating healing. This review brings together evidence on both synthetic and herbal strategies, comparing their mechanisms, effectiveness, safety, and cost considerations. While PPIs and antibiotic regimens remain indispensable for H. pylori eradication and NSAID-induced ulcer prevention, herbal therapeutics stand out for their lower side-effect profile and potential to provide long-term mucosal protection. Looking ahead, integrated treatment approaches that combine modern pharmacology with traditional phytomedicine may offer the most balanced and sustainable path for managing peptic ulcer disease.

Cover image for Mechanistic and Translational Evaluation of a Flavonoid Lead from

Mechanistic and Translational Evaluation of a Flavonoid Lead from

D.Tirumala, M. Anuradha

ABSTRACT Urolithiasis is a recurrent renal disorder characterized by calcium oxalate crystal deposition, oxidative stress, inflammation, and renal epithelial injury. Despite available therapies, recurrence rates remain high. Bryophyllum pinnatum (Lam.) Oken, traditionally used in urinary disorders, contains bioactive flavonoids with reported antioxidant and diuretic properties. However, the specific flavonoid(s) responsible for anti-urolithiatic activity and their mechanistic pathways remain unidentified. This study aims to isolate and characterize a flavonoid lead compound from B. pinnatum and evaluate its anti-urolithiatic activity through in vitro crystal assays, renal epithelial cell protection studies, and an ethylene glycol-induced rat model. Mechanistic pathways involving oxidative stress, inflammatory signaling, apoptosis, and renal transporter modulation will be explored. Translational biomarkers (KIM-1, NGAL, osteopontin) will be assessed to bridge preclinical findings with clinical relevance. The study is expected to validate a mechanistically defined phytopharmaceutical lead candidate for kidney stone prevention. Keywords: Urolithiasis, Bryophyllum pinnatum

Cover image for REVOLUTIONIZING PERIODONTAL PRACTICE THROUGH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

REVOLUTIONIZING PERIODONTAL PRACTICE THROUGH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ANUSHA GANGESAN, ALFIA JEFLIN JEEVA PRABAHAR, ABIRAMI NALLASAMY, AHAMEDHA KAMARUL FENANA SHAHIR, DR. DEEPSHIKA SARAVANAN, DR. MARIA SUBASH AARON M

Periodontitis is a multifactorial inflammatory disease characterized by progressive destruction of the periodontal supporting tissues, resulting from complex interactions between microbial biofilm and host immune responses. Conventional diagnostic approaches, including periodontal probing and radiographic evaluation, are limited by examiner variability and challenges in interpreting multiple interacting risk factors. In recent years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising adjunct in periodontology, enhancing diagnostic precision, risk assessment, and personalized treatment planning. AI applications in clinical periodontology include Natural Language Processing (NLP) for structured data extraction and improved clinical documentation, as well as machine learning and deep learning models for radiographic and clinical analysis. Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have demonstrated high accuracy in detecting periodontal bone loss, classifying disease severity, identifying implant systems, and predicting disease progression. Integration of radiographic, clinical, and multi-omics datasets further supports comprehensive risk profiling and precision-based care. Additionally, AI-assisted biomarker analysis using saliva and gingival crevicular fluid shows potential for non-invasive early detection. Emerging technologies such as smartphone-based monitoring systems, AI-enabled oral hygiene devices, and augmented/virtual reality–based educational tools enhance patient engagement and professional training. Despite challenges including data privacy concerns, ethical considerations, high implementation costs, and limited large-scale clinical validation, AI represents a valuable assistive technology that strengthens clinical decision-making and advances personalized periodontal care. This article aims to comprehensively discuss the current applications of artificial intelligence in periodontology, highlighting recent advancements, clinical implications, limitations, and future perspectives for integrating AI into routine periodontal practice. Keywords: Periodontitis; Artificial Intelligence; Deep Learning; Convolutional Neural Networks; Artificial Neural Networks; Natural Language Processing; Periodontal Diagnosis; Radiographic Analysis; Biomarkers;

Publication Process

Learn about our 4-step publication process

Submission Guidelines

Review requirements before submitting

Submit Article

Ready to submit your research?

2,866
Published Articles
1,523
Active Researchers
45
Countries
4.2
Impact Factor